One-page path checklist
Certifying ML in an aircraft system checklist
Printable one-pager for the Certifying ML in an aircraft system path. Items already cited on the aircraft ML path. None of these pages is a published means of compliance for airborne ML. Last checked 15 October 2026.
FAA
-
The roadmap’s primary purpose is a path to assuring the safety of AI in aircraft. It is not an advisory circular and does not publish a compliance checklist.
FAA AI Safety Assurance Roadmap -
The Q2 2026 Small Airplane Issues List tells applicants to coordinate with the Policy and Standards Division if planning AI or ML in the design. A means of compliance issue paper may be needed.
Q2 2026 Small Airplane Issues List -
The FAA says existing software and complex-hardware guidance is not adequate to address learned AI implementations, because traceability cannot be extended to an AI system developed through data.
FAA AI Safety Assurance Roadmap
EASA data / learning assurance
-
Issue 02 is preliminary guidance for Level 1 and Level 2 machine-learning applications and does not constitute final detailed guidance.
EASA Concept Paper Issue 02 -
EASA: a correct and complete ODD definition is a prerequisite to an adequate level of quality of the data sets.
EASA Concept Paper Issue 02 -
EASA objective DM-01: identify data sources and collect data in accordance with the defined ODD while ensuring data quality requirements are satisfied.
EASA Concept Paper Issue 02 -
EASA bases learning assurance on three separate and independent data sets.
EASA Concept Paper Issue 02
Existing and draft standards
-
RTCA still publishes DO-178() as the software standards documents for airborne systems. The FAA roadmap says it is supporting possible extension of DO-178C, DO-330 and related documents.
RTCA DO-178() -
Joint SAE G-34 / EUROCAE WG-114 work on ED-324 / ARP6983 is listed as Draft on EUROCAE’s page.
EUROCAE WG-114
Questions
Is this a substitute for the standard or the contract?
No. Each item is a starting-point evidence prompt taken from the matching Path and its cited articles. It is informational only and is not professional, engineering, certification or legal advice.
Where did the items come from?
Only official URLs already cited on that Path or on articles the Path already links. We did not add unverified items.