<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI Assurance Directory articles</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/</link><description>Source-cited articles from AI Assurance Directory. Every factual claim links to a public source.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>CISA joint principles for integrating AI into operational technology: what plant and infrastructure buyers can ask vendors</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cisa-joint-principles-secure-integration-of-ai-in-operational-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cisa-joint-principles-secure-integration-of-ai-in-operational-technology/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>The four principles in the December 2025 CISA, ASD ACSC and partner guidance on AI in OT, with the vendor-transparency, testing and failsafe passages that matter to buyers.</description></item><item><title>EU AI Act Article 4 AI literacy: what the Commission Q&amp;A and the amended text say</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-article-4-ai-literacy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-article-4-ai-literacy/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What Article 4 asks of providers and deployers after the 2026 AI Omnibus, per the Commission&apos;s Q&amp;A and the Service Desk text. No certificate or specific training is mandated.</description></item><item><title>EU AI Act Article 6 high-risk classification: Annex I products, Annex III uses and the safety-component rule</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-article-6-high-risk-classification-safety-components/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-article-6-high-risk-classification-safety-components/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How Article 6 sorts AI systems into high-risk, including the 2026 Omnibus paragraphs on safety components and the Article 6(3) documented-assessment route for Annex III.</description></item><item><title>EU AI Act Articles 14 and 26: human oversight, who builds it and who staffs it</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-articles-14-and-26-human-oversight-provider-and-deployer-duties/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-articles-14-and-26-human-oversight-provider-and-deployer-duties/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Article 14 makes providers design high-risk AI for human oversight, including a stop control; Article 26 makes deployers assign competent people and keep logs. Quoted from the Service Desk text.</description></item><item><title>EU AI Act Articles 9 and 15: risk management, accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity for high-risk AI</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-articles-9-and-15-risk-management-accuracy-robustness-cybersecurity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-articles-9-and-15-risk-management-accuracy-robustness-cybersecurity/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What Articles 9 and 15 of the AI Act require of high-risk systems, quoted from the Service Desk text: lifecycle risk management, declared accuracy, fail-safe robustness and poisoning defenses.</description></item><item><title>MITRE ATLAS for AI red teaming: tactics, techniques, mitigations and case studies</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/mitre-atlas-for-ai-red-teaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/mitre-atlas-for-ai-red-teaming/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the public MITRE ATLAS data release contains, how a red team can use its IDs and mitigations in a test plan, and what it does not certify.</description></item><item><title>NIST AI RMF Playbook: Measure and Manage suggested actions for safety-critical AI</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-rmf-playbook-measure-and-manage-suggested-actions-for-safety-critical-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-rmf-playbook-measure-and-manage-suggested-actions-for-safety-critical-ai/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the NIST AI RMF Playbook is and which Measure 2.5, 2.6 and Manage 2.4 suggested actions map to validation, fail-safe testing and bypass plans on a safety-critical program.</description></item><item><title>NIST Cyber AI Profile (IR 8596): what the preliminary draft covers and how far to rely on it</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-cyber-ai-profile-ir-8596-preliminary-draft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-cyber-ai-profile-ir-8596-preliminary-draft/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>NIST IR 8596 is a preliminary-draft CSF 2.0 profile for AI cybersecurity with Secure, Defend and Thwart focus areas. What the NIST page says, its draft status, and what to ask suppliers.</description></item><item><title>NIST SP 800-53 control overlays for securing AI systems (COSAiS): the five use cases and what is still draft</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-sp-800-53-cosais-control-overlays-for-securing-ai-systems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-sp-800-53-cosais-control-overlays-for-securing-ai-systems/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>NIST&apos;s COSAiS project is building SP 800-53 overlays for generative AI, predictive AI, single- and multi-agent AI, and AI developers. What the project pages say, and what to ask for meanwhile.</description></item><item><title>OWASP Top 10 for LLM and Gen AI apps (2025): questions to put to a vendor</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/owasp-top-10-for-llm-applications-2025-buyer-questions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/owasp-top-10-for-llm-applications-2025-buyer-questions/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How five entries of the OWASP 2025 LLM Top 10 (prompt injection, supply chain, poisoning, output handling, excessive agency) turn into vendor questions, using OWASP&apos;s own mitigation text.</description></item><item><title>Motor-vehicle AI under the AI Act — Annex I Section B and Article 2(2)</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-act-annex-i-section-b-motor-vehicles-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-act-annex-i-section-b-motor-vehicles-ai/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the Commission AI Act Service Desk pages say about motor-vehicle regulations in Annex I Section B and which AI Act provisions Article 2(2) applies to them.</description></item><item><title>ARP4754B FDAL and IDAL when the function is machine learning</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/arp4754b-fdal-idal-for-ml-functions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/arp4754b-fdal-idal-for-ml-functions/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How FAA AC 20-174 treats FDAL and IDAL, what EASA Issue 2 says about IDAL A/B ML constituents, and why ARP4754B is not an AI certificate.</description></item><item><title>Automotive AI assurance — ISO 26262, ISO/PAS 8800 and UL 4600</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/automotive-ai-iso-26262-pas-8800-ul-4600/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/automotive-ai-iso-26262-pas-8800-ul-4600/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What official ISO and UL catalog pages say about functional safety, AI in road vehicles, and autonomous-product safety cases — and what they do not say.</description></item><item><title>Automotive AI — separating tool-qualification claims from vehicle-level safety claims</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/automotive-ai-tool-claims-versus-vehicle-level-claims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/automotive-ai-tool-claims-versus-vehicle-level-claims/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How the cited vendor pages for automotive tools name ISO 26262 and ISO/PAS 8800, and why a tool claim is not a vehicle claim (editorial judgment).</description></item><item><title>Automotive ML component — what evidence will an assessor expect?</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/automotive-ml-component-what-evidence-will-an-assessor-expect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/automotive-ml-component-what-evidence-will-an-assessor-expect/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the public ISO, UL and EU pages say about evidence for a machine-learning component in a road vehicle, and where they stop. Editorial judgment is labeled.</description></item><item><title>CDAO RAI Toolkit versus Tradewinds AIA Toolkit</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cdao-rai-toolkit-vs-tradewinds-aia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cdao-rai-toolkit-vs-tradewinds-aia/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Why the 2023 RAI Toolkit and the live Tradewinds AIA Toolkit are the same public self-evaluation resource, plus the December 2024 generative-AI companion PDF.</description></item><item><title>Choosing AI red-teaming tools for safety-critical programs</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/choosing-ai-red-teaming-tools-for-safety-critical-programs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/choosing-ai-red-teaming-tools-for-safety-critical-programs/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How official CDAO, NIST and DoD pages define AI red-teaming, which listed tools name those uses, and what no page makes a contract clause.</description></item><item><title>CMMC and AI tools handling CUI</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-and-ai-tools-handling-cui/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-and-ai-tools-handling-cui/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What 32 CFR Part 170 and DFARS 252.204-7021 actually require when an AI tool processes CUI, and why there is no AI-specific CMMC clause.</description></item><item><title>DO-200B aeronautical data versus ML training sets</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/do-200b-aeronautical-data-vs-ml-training-sets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/do-200b-aeronautical-data-vs-ml-training-sets/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What FAA AC 20-153B treats as aeronautical data, why DO-200B is not EASA learning assurance, and what a program may still need both packages for.</description></item><item><title>DoD 3000.09 compliance checklist for autonomy vendors</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dod-3000-09-compliance-checklist-for-autonomy-vendors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dod-3000-09-compliance-checklist-for-autonomy-vendors/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>A vendor-facing checklist from DoD Directive 3000.09: scope, human judgment, V&amp;V and T&amp;E, senior review, and what the directive excludes.</description></item><item><title>DoD RAI Implementation Pathway: what the 64 lines of effort ask industry</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dod-rai-implementation-pathway-for-industry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dod-rai-implementation-pathway-for-industry/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What CDAO’s public pages say the June 2022 RAI Strategy and Implementation Pathway is, how the toolkit implements it, and what is not a contractor certificate.</description></item><item><title>EASA AI Concept Paper Issue 2 explained for suppliers</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/easa-ai-concept-paper-issue-2-for-suppliers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/easa-ai-concept-paper-issue-2-for-suppliers/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What Issue 2 asks a supplier to show for Level 1 and Level 2 ML: ODD, independent data sets, learning assurance, and why it is not an AMC.</description></item><item><title>FDA’s List of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices — what it is and is not</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/fda-ai-enabled-device-list-what-it-is-and-is-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/fda-ai-enabled-device-list-what-it-is-and-is-not/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What FDA’s AI-enabled device list page says about its purpose and its limits, and how a buyer or supplier should and should not use it (editorial note labeled).</description></item><item><title>FDA Good Machine Learning Practice guiding principles — what the page says</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/fda-good-machine-learning-practice-guiding-principles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/fda-good-machine-learning-practice-guiding-principles/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What FDA’s Good Machine Learning Practice guiding-principles page says about the IMDRF document, and how it sits beside the PCCP guidance (editorial note labeled).</description></item><item><title>How to qualify an ML tool under DO-330</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/how-to-qualify-an-ml-tool-under-do-330/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/how-to-qualify-an-ml-tool-under-do-330/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>A buyer-side walkthrough of the DO-178C 12.2 decision, TQL-5 versus TQL-1, and what no public table assigns to training or robustness tools.</description></item><item><title>IEC 61508-3 software requirements and ISO/IEC TR 5469 — where learned components sit</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-61508-3-software-requirements-and-learned-components/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-61508-3-software-requirements-and-learned-components/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Official catalog scope statements for IEC 61508-3:2010 and ISO/IEC TR 5469:2024, with a labeled editorial reading for machinery and process buyers.</description></item><item><title>Process-industry SIS — IEC 61511 and the parent IEC 61508 publication</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-61511-process-sis-and-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-61511-process-sis-and-ai/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Official IEC catalog pages for safety instrumented systems in the process sector, and what they do not say about machine learning.</description></item><item><title>IEC 61511 SIS life-cycle questions for AI in process plants</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-61511-sis-lifecycle-questions-for-ai-in-process-plants/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-61511-sis-lifecycle-questions-for-ai-in-process-plants/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>IEC 61511-1:2016 and its 2017 consolidated version as catalogued by IEC, and an editorial question list for AI tools near a safety instrumented system.</description></item><item><title>IEC 62304 and FDA PCCP — two ways of talking about changes to AI device software</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-62304-and-fda-pccp-change-control-for-ai-software/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iec-62304-and-fda-pccp-change-control-for-ai-software/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>IEC 62304 and its 2015 amendment next to the FDA PCCP guidance: what each official page says, and an editorial comparison of what a change-control record must answer.</description></item><item><title>Industrial machinery ML — what evidence will a notified body expect?</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/industrial-machinery-ml-what-evidence-will-a-notified-body-expect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/industrial-machinery-ml-what-evidence-will-a-notified-body-expect/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What IEC and AI Act Service Desk pages say about software evidence and learned components in machinery safety functions, and where public text stops. Editorial judgment is labeled.</description></item><item><title>ISO 10218 scope and exclusions — a checklist for AI-enabled robot buyers</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-10218-scope-exclusions-for-ai-robot-buyers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-10218-scope-exclusions-for-ai-robot-buyers/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the ISO catalog says ISO 10218-1:2025 covers and excludes, how it relates to Regulation (EU) 2023/1230, and an editorial buyer checklist.</description></item><item><title>ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI 100-1: the two source documents behind the crosswalk</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-42001-nist-ai-100-1-source-documents-and-crosswalk-caveats/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-42001-nist-ai-100-1-source-documents-and-crosswalk-caveats/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Exact titles, what each document is, and the caveats NIST and the crosswalk itself state, before you rely on any clause-to-subcategory row.</description></item><item><title>ISO 42001 vs NIST AI RMF for defense contractors</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-42001-vs-nist-ai-rmf-for-defense-contractors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-42001-vs-nist-ai-rmf-for-defense-contractors/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What a DIB team should take from the certifiable AIMS versus the voluntary RMF, using NIST’s published crosswalk and DoD’s own statement that the RAI toolkit builds on the RMF.</description></item><item><title>ISO/PAS 8800 and ISO 26262 — reading the scope lines side by side</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-pas-8800-and-iso-26262-reading-the-scope-lines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-pas-8800-and-iso-26262-reading-the-scope-lines/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Side-by-side reading of the ISO catalog scope statements for ISO 26262-1:2018 and ISO/PAS 8800:2024, with a labeled editorial note on supplier questions.</description></item><item><title>Industrial machinery AI — Regulation 2023/1230, ISO 10218 and IEC 61508</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/machinery-regulation-2023-1230-iso-10218-iec-61508/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/machinery-regulation-2023-1230-iso-10218-iec-61508/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Official EUR-Lex, ISO and IEC pages for machinery AI provisions, industrial-robot safety and the parent functional-safety publication.</description></item><item><title>Machinery Regulation 2023/1230 in AI Act Annex I Section B — what the official pages say</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/machinery-regulation-ai-act-annex-i-section-b-item-21/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/machinery-regulation-ai-act-annex-i-section-b-item-21/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>The Commission AI Act Service Desk lists Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 in Annex I Section B; Article 2(2) limits which AI Act provisions apply to such products.</description></item><item><title>Medical-device AI — FDA PCCP, IEC 62304 and EU MDR plus the AI Act</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/medical-device-ai-fda-pccp-iec-62304-mdr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/medical-device-ai-fda-pccp-iec-62304-mdr/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Official FDA, IEC and EUR-Lex pages for AI-enabled device software, software life-cycle processes, and MDR as AI Act Annex I item 11.</description></item><item><title>Medical device ML — what evidence does FDA expect in a submission?</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/medical-device-ml-what-evidence-does-fda-expect-in-a-submission/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/medical-device-ml-what-evidence-does-fda-expect-in-a-submission/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What FDA’s January 2025 draft AI-enabled device software functions guidance and its PCCP guidance say a submission should contain, from the sections we read. Editorial judgment is labeled.</description></item><item><title>NASA SWEHB Artificial Intelligence topics 7.25 and 8.25 for flight software</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nasa-swehb-super-intelligence-topics-flight-software/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nasa-swehb-super-intelligence-topics-flight-software/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What SWEHB 7.25 and 8.25 tell NASA AI/ML projects about NPR 7150.2 and safety-critical limits. Official titles stay Artificial Intelligence. Handbook topics, not a certificate.</description></item><item><title>NIST AI 100-2 adversarial ML terms for defense T&amp;E</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-100-2-adversarial-ml-defense-te/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-100-2-adversarial-ml-defense-te/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What NIST AI 100-2e2025’s adversarial-machine-learning taxonomy is, how it sits next to CDAO T&amp;E and ATLAS, and what it does not certify.</description></item><item><title>NIST SP 800-218A SSDF for generative AI in defense software</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-sp-800-218a-ssdf-generative-ai-defense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-sp-800-218a-ssdf-generative-ai-defense/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the July 2024 SSDF Community Profile adds for generative and dual-use models, how it sits next to CMMC and the AI RMF, and what it does not certify.</description></item><item><title>Process industries ML — what evidence will an assessor expect?</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/process-industries-ml-what-evidence-will-an-assessor-expect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/process-industries-ml-what-evidence-will-an-assessor-expect/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the IEC catalog says about IEC 61511-1, IEC 61508-3 and ISO/IEC TR 5469 for an ML component near a safety instrumented system. Editorial judgment is labeled.</description></item><item><title>Process-industry SIS vendor pages — IEC 61511 named, IEC 61508 named, or neither</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/process-sis-vendor-pages-iec-61511-named-versus-implied/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/process-sis-vendor-pages-iec-61511-named-versus-implied/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How four process-safety vendor pages word their standards claims, read against the IEC catalog scope of IEC 61511-1 and IEC 61508-1 (editorial reading labeled).</description></item><item><title>Prompt guardrails versus airborne runtime assurance</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/prompt-guardrails-vs-airborne-runtime-assurance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/prompt-guardrails-vs-airborne-runtime-assurance/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Why cloud LLM input/output rails are not NASA/ASTM runtime assurance, using the cited NeMo, Bedrock, Azure and NASA TM pages.</description></item><item><title>Turning the ISO/IEC 42001 to NIST AI RMF crosswalk into supplier evidence requests</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/using-the-iso-42001-nist-ai-rmf-crosswalk-for-supplier-evidence-requests/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/using-the-iso-42001-nist-ai-rmf-crosswalk-for-supplier-evidence-requests/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How a buyer can use the rows NIST published to decide what documents to ask an AI supplier for, with the editorial steps clearly separated from the sourced mappings.</description></item><item><title>An AI assurance glossary for aerospace and defense</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-assurance-glossary-aerospace-defense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-assurance-glossary-aerospace-defense/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Official meanings of the terms that show up in FAA, EASA, NIST, DoD and CMMC AI work, each tied to the source that uses it.</description></item><item><title>An AI audit evidence checklist for regulated programs</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-audit-evidence-checklist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-audit-evidence-checklist/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>A checklist of evidence artifacts for AI audits, each tied to the ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, EASA, NIST SP 800-171 or DoD source that expects it.</description></item><item><title>AI in MRO and predictive maintenance: regulatory considerations (FAA/EASA official material)</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-in-mro-predictive-maintenance-faa-easa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-in-mro-predictive-maintenance-faa-easa/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>FAA Roadmap maintenance and retirement sentences, AC 43-218 IAHM with no AI words found, and EASA-hosted ForMuLA research — not an MRO AI regulation.</description></item><item><title>AI incident reporting: EU AI Act Article 73 vs DoD guidance</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-incident-reporting-eu-ai-act-article-73-vs-dod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-incident-reporting-eu-ai-act-article-73-vs-dod/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Article 73 sets timed serious-incident reports for high-risk AI. Public DoD pages describe RAI repositories and existing processes, not an Article 73 equivalent.</description></item><item><title>AI red-teaming requirements for defense programs</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-red-teaming-requirements-for-defense-programs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ai-red-teaming-requirements-for-defense-programs/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What official DoD, CDAO and NIST pages actually say about AI red-teaming, and what they do not make a contract clause.</description></item><item><title>Army, Navy and Air Force AI policies that name acquisition</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/army-navy-air-force-ai-acquisition-policies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/army-navy-air-force-ai-acquisition-policies/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What Army Project Linchpin, the Navy Strategy to Weaponize Data and Artificial Intelligence, and the DAF Artificial Intelligence Strategy actually say about buying and fielding AI.</description></item><item><title>Australia Defence Policy Settings for Responsible Use of AI</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/australia-defence-responsible-use-of-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/australia-defence-responsible-use-of-ai/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What Australia&apos;s Policy Settings for Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Defence publish as lawfulness, values-based principles and proportionate controls, versus DST&apos;s research method.</description></item><item><title>Autonomy and DoD Directive 3000.09 explained</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/autonomy-and-dod-directive-3000-09-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/autonomy-and-dod-directive-3000-09-explained/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What DoD Directive 3000.09 (25 January 2023) actually covers: weapon-system autonomy, human judgment, senior review, and what it excludes.</description></item><item><title>Building an AI assurance case (GSN/AMLAS) for certification</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/building-an-ai-assurance-case-gsn-amlas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/building-an-ai-assurance-case-gsn-amlas/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the GSN Community Standard and AMLAS actually specify, and why neither is a published FAA or EASA means of compliance.</description></item><item><title>Canada DND/CAF Artificial Intelligence Strategy</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/canada-dnd-caf-artificial-intelligence-strategy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/canada-dnd-caf-artificial-intelligence-strategy/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the 2024 Department of National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces Artificial Intelligence Strategy publishes as its 2030 vision, five lines of effort, and procurement tasks.</description></item><item><title>CDAO test and evaluation of Artificial Intelligence models</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cdao-test-and-evaluation-ai-systems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cdao-test-and-evaluation-ai-systems/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>CDAO Test and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models Framework: four T&amp;E focus areas, what the April 2024 document says it is not, and how JATIC software fits.</description></item><item><title>CMMC and AI with CUI - what the rules actually say</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-and-ai-with-cui/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-and-ai-with-cui/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 apply when an AI system, including a cloud AI service, handles controlled unclassified information, and where the rules are silent.</description></item><item><title>CMMC Level 2 vs Level 3 for AI systems</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-level-2-vs-level-3-for-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-level-2-vs-level-3-for-ai/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What 32 CFR Part 170 actually requires at CMMC Level 2 and Level 3 when an AI system handles CUI, and what the Phase 2 suspension changes.</description></item><item><title>CMMC Program scoping for generative systems that handle CUI</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-program-scoping-generative-ai-cui/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/cmmc-program-scoping-generative-ai-cui/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What 32 CFR Part 170 actually calls the program, including the live CMMC 2.0 resource page, and how Level 2 asset categories apply to generative components.</description></item><item><title>Data assurance for ML in avionics: EASA learning assurance</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/data-assurance-ml-avionics-easa-learning-assurance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/data-assurance-ml-avionics-easa-learning-assurance/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What EASA Issue 2 and the MLEAP research project say about data quality, the ODD, and the three data sets in the W-shaped process.</description></item><item><title>Data provenance and supply-chain security for ML models (SBOM/AIBOM)</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/data-provenance-and-supply-chain-security-for-ml-models-sbom-aibom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/data-provenance-and-supply-chain-security-for-ml-models-sbom-aibom/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What CISA, NIST and NTIA actually say about SBOMs for AI software, and how CycloneDX ML-BOM and SPDX AI profiles relate, without inventing a mandate.</description></item><item><title>Supplier flow-down clauses for SI/AI in defense contracts</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dfars-far-flowdown-ai-si-defense-contracts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dfars-far-flowdown-ai-si-defense-contracts/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>No DFARS or FAR clause titled AI or Super Intelligence. What 252.204-7012, 7020, 7021 and FAR 52.204-21 actually require primes to flow down.</description></item><item><title>DO-178C and machine learning: where the gaps are</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/do-178c-and-machine-learning-gaps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/do-178c-and-machine-learning-gaps/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Where requirements-based airborne software assurance strains under data-driven machine learning, and what EASA, the FAA and SAE G-34 are doing about each gap.</description></item><item><title>DO-330 tool qualification for ML development and verification toolchains</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/do-330-tool-qualification-ml-toolchains/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/do-330-tool-qualification-ml-toolchains/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>When an ML training or verification program is a DO-330 tool. FTP1055 criteria, TQL-5 versus TQL-1, FAA Order 8110.49A, and what no public table assigns.</description></item><item><title>DoD RAI Toolkit vs NIST AI RMF: what each one is for</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dod-rai-toolkit-vs-nist-ai-rmf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/dod-rai-toolkit-vs-nist-ai-rmf/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What the DoD RAI Toolkit and the NIST AI RMF each say about themselves, and the official statement that the toolkit builds on the RMF.</description></item><item><title>Does the FAA certify AI today? Current status</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/does-the-faa-certify-ai-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/does-the-faa-certify-ai-today/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>The FAA still has no published AI-specific certification standard. What Version I of the roadmap, the STEP discipline page, and the 2026 Small Airplane Issues List actually say.</description></item><item><title>EASA AI Concept Paper levels explained</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/easa-ai-concept-paper-levels-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/easa-ai-concept-paper-levels-explained/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What EASA Issue 2 says about Level 1 and Level 2 AI, and what proposed Issue 03 adds for Level 0 and Level 3.</description></item><item><title>EU AI Act general-purpose AI model obligations</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-gpai-model-obligations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-gpai-model-obligations/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Chapter V GPAI model duties apply from 2 August 2025. They are not the postponed high-risk system dates, and not an aviation AMC.</description></item><item><title>EU AI Act obligations for aerospace suppliers outside the EU</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-obligations-aerospace-suppliers-outside-eu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-obligations-aerospace-suppliers-outside-eu/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How Article 2 of the EU AI Act can apply to aerospace suppliers established outside the Union, and which aviation and defence exclusions the official text actually states.</description></item><item><title>EU AI Act scope for defense and aviation: what is in, what is out, and the new dates</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-scope-defense-and-aviation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/eu-ai-act-scope-defense-and-aviation/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How the AI Act&apos;s military exclusion, dual-use rule and civil aviation treatment work, and which compliance dates apply after the July 2026 Digital Omnibus.</description></item><item><title>Executive Order 14434: Super Intelligence (SI) terminology for aerospace and defense teams</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/executive-order-14434-super-intelligence-aerospace-defense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/executive-order-14434-super-intelligence-aerospace-defense/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What EO 14434 changes for U.S. executive-branch documents, and what it does not: statutes, regulations, historical records, and non-federal standards.</description></item><item><title>The FAA AI Safety Assurance Roadmap, explained</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/faa-ai-safety-assurance-roadmap-explained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/faa-ai-safety-assurance-roadmap-explained/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>A plain-language walk through the FAA&apos;s Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence Safety Assurance Version I - what it commits to, what it leaves open, and what it means for applicants.</description></item><item><title>FAA and EASA AI certification timelines compared</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/faa-easa-ai-certification-timelines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/faa-easa-ai-certification-timelines/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>FAA AI Safety Assurance Roadmap milestones versus EASA AI Roadmap 2.0 and RMT.0742 dates: what is published and what is still scheduled.</description></item><item><title>FAA proposed Part 108 BVLOS and DoD Directive 3000.09</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/faa-part-108-bvlos-and-dod-3000-09/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/faa-part-108-bvlos-and-dod-3000-09/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Two live autonomy regimes: the FAA/TSA NPRM that would create 14 CFR Part 108 for civil UAS BVLOS, versus DoD Directive 3000.09 on autonomy in weapon systems.</description></item><item><title>FedRAMP and IL levels for AI SaaS in defense</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/fedramp-and-il-levels-for-ai-saas-in-defense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/fedramp-and-il-levels-for-ai-saas-in-defense/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What FedRAMP.gov and official DoD pages actually say about FedRAMP Certification versus DoD Impact Levels for AI cloud services — two different systems.</description></item><item><title>Formal verification of neural networks: what&apos;s usable today</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/formal-verification-neural-networks-whats-usable-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/formal-verification-neural-networks-whats-usable-today/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What official neural-network verifier docs and papers actually claim, using ACAS Xu aviation examples, and what they do not make a certification path.</description></item><item><title>Human-machine teaming in DoD and NATO guidance</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/human-machine-teaming-requirements-dod-nato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/human-machine-teaming-requirements-dod-nato/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What official DoD, NATO, UK MOD and EASA pages actually say about human judgment, human control and human-AI teaming.</description></item><item><title>ISO/IEC 42001 vs NIST AI RMF: a practical crosswalk</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-42001-vs-nist-ai-rmf-crosswalk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-42001-vs-nist-ai-rmf-crosswalk/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How the certifiable ISO/IEC 42001 management system and the voluntary NIST AI RMF fit together, with example mappings taken from NIST&apos;s published crosswalk.</description></item><item><title>ISO/IEC 23894 and 5338 for engineering teams</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-23894-and-5338-for-engineering-teams/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-23894-and-5338-for-engineering-teams/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What ISO catalog abstracts say ISO/IEC 23894:2023 risk guidance and ISO/IEC 5338:2023 life-cycle processes are, and that neither is a certifiable AIMS or aviation AMC.</description></item><item><title>ISO/IEC 24029 neural-network robustness is not an aviation AMC</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-24029-neural-network-robustness/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-24029-neural-network-robustness/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>ISO/IEC TR 24029-1 and 24029-2 assess neural-network robustness. Catalog text only: they are not an FAA or EASA AMC. Part 3 is still a draft.</description></item><item><title>What auditors ask for in an ISO/IEC 42001 certification audit</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-42001-certification-audit-what-auditors-ask/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-42001-certification-audit-what-auditors-ask/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What UKAS- and ANAB-accredited certification bodies publish about an ISO/IEC 42001 audit, from public accreditation and certification-body material only.</description></item><item><title>ISO/IEC 42001 vs ISO 9001/AS9100 for aerospace quality systems</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-42001-vs-iso-9001-as9100-aerospace-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-42001-vs-iso-9001-as9100-aerospace-quality/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What ISO, IAQG and ANAB actually say about AI management systems versus quality management and the 9100-series — and that we found no official ICOP 42001 scheme.</description></item><item><title>ISO/IEC 42005:2025 AI system impact assessment</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-42005-ai-system-impact-assessment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-42005-ai-system-impact-assessment/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>ISO/IEC 42005:2025 is guidance for AI system impact assessments. Catalog facts only: it complements 42001 and 23894 and is not a certifiable AIMS.</description></item><item><title>ISO/IEC TR 5469 and IEC 61508 for ML components</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-tr-5469-and-iec-61508-for-ml/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/iso-iec-tr-5469-and-iec-61508-for-ml/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What official ISO and IEC catalog pages say about AI in safety-related functions, and what they do not say about SIL for machine learning.</description></item><item><title>ITAR/EAR export controls and AI models</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/itar-ear-export-controls-and-ai-models/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/itar-ear-export-controls-and-ai-models/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What BIS and DDTC official pages actually control for AI models and software: USML technical data, EAR model weights under ECCN 4E091, and what they do not call a general AI license.</description></item><item><title>Japan MOD AI utilization policy and ATLA responsible AI R&amp;D guideline</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/japan-mod-ai-utilization-policy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/japan-mod-ai-utilization-policy/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What Japan&apos;s July 2024 防衛省ＡＩ活用推進基本方針 and ATLA&apos;s Guideline for Responsible AI Application in R&amp;D of AI-Equipped Defense Systems actually say.</description></item><item><title>How to map an AI model to DO-178C / DO-330 tool qualification</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/mapping-ai-models-to-do-178c-do-330-tool-qualification/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/mapping-ai-models-to-do-178c-do-330-tool-qualification/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What DO-330 actually qualifies, why a trained model is usually the software item rather than a tool, and what the FAA has said about extending DO-330 to AI.</description></item><item><title>Model cards and system cards for defense AI documentation</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/model-cards-and-system-cards-for-defense-ai-documentation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/model-cards-and-system-cards-for-defense-ai-documentation/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What official model-card and system-card pages actually specify, and what CDAO and NIST documents do and do not require for defense programs.</description></item><item><title>NATO&apos;s revised AI Strategy and the Principles of Responsible Use</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nato-revised-ai-strategy-principles-of-responsible-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nato-revised-ai-strategy-principles-of-responsible-use/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What NATO&apos;s 2021 and 2024 Artificial Intelligence Strategy summaries actually say about the six Principles of Responsible Use, TEV&amp;V, DIANA and Allied industry.</description></item><item><title>NIST AI 600-1 (Generative AI Profile) for defense contractors</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-600-1-for-defense-contractors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-600-1-for-defense-contractors/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What NIST AI 600-1 actually is, which generative-AI risks it names, and how that sits next to CMMC and DoD Responsible AI rather than replacing them.</description></item><item><title>NIST AI 600-1 suggested actions for generative AI on a defense program</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-600-1-generative-actions-defense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-ai-600-1-generative-actions-defense/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Which NIST AI 600-1 suggested actions name acquisition, contractors, national security and information security, and what they do not make mandatory for DoD work.</description></item><item><title>Which NIST SP 800-171 controls matter most when AI tools handle CUI?</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-sp-800-171-controls-ai-tools-cui/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/nist-sp-800-171-controls-ai-tools-cui/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Official pages do not rank a subset of 800-171 for AI. What CMMC, NIST and NSA/CISA actually say when AI systems process CUI.</description></item><item><title>Rotorcraft and eVTOL autonomy: FAA/EASA powered-lift and SC-VTOL AI-relevant guidance</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/rotorcraft-evtol-autonomy-faa-easa-powered-lift/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/rotorcraft-evtol-autonomy-faa-easa-powered-lift/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>FAA powered-lift AC 21.17-4, the FAA Safety Framework for Aircraft Automation, and EASA SC-VTOL: what they say, and that a search of SC-VTOL-02 found no AI or ML words.</description></item><item><title>Runtime assurance and simplex architectures for ML in flight</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/runtime-assurance-simplex-architectures-ml-in-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/runtime-assurance-simplex-architectures-ml-in-flight/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What NASA, ASTM F3269-21 and the 1998 Simplex paper say about runtime assurance for ML in flight — and what they do not call a means of compliance.</description></item><item><title>SAE G-34 / ARP6983 status: what is published versus still draft</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/sae-g-34-arp6983-status/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/sae-g-34-arp6983-status/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>EUROCAE WG-114 still lists ED-324 / ARP6983 as Draft. Companion ER drafts, published AIR dates, and what EASA and the FAA have and have not accepted.</description></item><item><title>Space systems and AI assurance (NASA/ESA/Space Force official guidance)</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/space-systems-and-ai-assurance-nasa-esa-ussf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/space-systems-and-ai-assurance-nasa-esa-ussf/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What NASA SWEHB Artificial Intelligence topics, ESA AISSA public pages and the Space Force FY2025 Data and AI plan actually say — and what they do not call a certification standard.</description></item><item><title>What JSP 936 Part 1 asks of industry partners and suppliers</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/uk-mod-jsp-936-supplier-obligations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/uk-mod-jsp-936-supplier-obligations/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Who UK MOD JSP 936 Part 1 binds, what must versus should means for suppliers, how legacy AI is treated, and how the AI Practitioner&apos;s Handbook relates.</description></item><item><title>UK MOD JSP 936 vs DoD Responsible AI</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/uk-mod-jsp-936-vs-dod-responsible-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/uk-mod-jsp-936-vs-dod-responsible-ai/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What official UK MOD and US DoD pages each claim about dependable or responsible AI, without inventing a clause-by-clause map.</description></item><item><title>UL 4600 is not an aviation or DoD 3000.09 means of compliance</title><link>https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ul-4600-vs-aviation-and-dod-autonomy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://aiassurancedirectory.com/articles/ul-4600-vs-aviation-and-dod-autonomy/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What UL 4600’s public catalog actually scopes (autonomous vehicles, no human driver) versus FAA, EASA and DoD 3000.09 pages. Not an aviation AMC we have found.</description></item></channel></rss>